4.7 Article

Non-cell-autonomous roles for the planar cell polarity gene Vangl2 in development of the coronary circulation

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 615-623

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.160861

关键词

Vangl2; planar cell polarity; cardiac development; myocardium; coronary vasculature

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [BS/05/003, PG/05/041] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G120/861, MC_UP_1502/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1502/1, G120/861] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [MC_UP_1502/1, G120/861] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Establishment of cellular polarity is essential for the development of many tissues. In this study, we describe defects in the formation of the coronary vasculature in the loop-tail (Lp) mutant in which the planar cell polarity (PCP) gene, Vangl2, is disrupted. Although Vangl2 is expressed exclusively in the myocardial cells of the developing heart, the coronary vessels do not develop an intact smooth muscle layer, and there are enlarged, ectopic vessels on the surface of the heart. Reduced fibronectin deposition in the subepicardial space is associated with limited migration of epicardially derived cells (EPDCs) into the ventricular myocardium and likely contributes to these defects. Analysis of cardiomyocytes shows that the actin cytoskeleton is disrupted and the cytoarchitecture of the ventricular myocardium is abnormal in Lp/Lp hearts. Moreover, activation of RhoA/Rho kinase signaling is disrupted in these cells. Conditional inhibition of myocardial Rho kinase activity disrupts the organization of the cardiomyocytes and formation of the coronary vessels to produce the same spectrum of defects as seen in Lp. These data suggest that Vangl2 and Rho kinase act cell autonomously in the myocardium to regulate the organization of cardiomyocytes but also have non-cellautonomous effects on the formation of the coronary vasculature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据