4.5 Article

Enhanced Bioactive Myocardial Transforming Growth Factor-β in Advanced Human Heart Failure

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 78, 期 11, 页码 2711-+

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0511

关键词

Cardiomyopathy; Heart failure; Myocardial fibrosis; Transforming growth factor-beta; Ventricular remodeling

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [P20RR020173-01, P20GM103446-12, R01HL105993, R01HL089847]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta activation is known to play a central role in progressive ventricular remodeling in advanced heart failure in animal models, but there has been no direct evidence of increased TGF-beta activity in the myocardium of patients with advanced human heart failure. Methods and Results: Using a recently developed bioassay that measures TGF-beta bioactivity rather than TGF-beta abundance, we measured bioactive TGF-beta in human myocardium from control non-failing donors (NF), and patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Both free and total soluble TGF-beta were significantly increased in ICM and DCM compared with NF. Free TGF-beta had an excellent correlation with phosphorylated Smad2 (R-2=0.55, P<0.0001), a downstream marker of TGF-beta signaling. Collagen type I and type III were significantly upregulated in DCM compared with NF, consistent with histological evidence of myocardial fibrosis. Expression of fibulin-2, a positive modulator of TGF-beta, was significantly increased in DCM compared with NF, and the free TGF-beta level was correlated with fibulin-2 mRNA (R-2=0.24, P<0.006). Conclusions: Although both free and total soluble TGF-beta are significantly increased in ICM and DCM compared with NF, the superior correlation of free TGF-beta with downstream signaling suggests that this is the most functionally relevant form. The present findings suggest that sustained TGF-beta activation in both ICM and DCM contributes to excess myocardial fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据