4.5 Article

Safety of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Testing for Cardiac Patients in Japan - A Nationwide Survey

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 78, 期 7, 页码 1646-1653

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1590

关键词

Acute myocardial infarction; Adverse events; Cardiac rehabilitation; Exercise testing; Safety

资金

  1. Research Grant for Cardiovascular Diseases from Ministry of Hearth, Labor and Welfare, Japan [15A-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The safety of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has not been investigated in Japan, so a nationwide survey was conducted to investigate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with CR and exercise testing. Methods and Results: In total, 136 hospitals reported operating recovery-phase CR programs, amounting to 383,096 patient-hours of exercise training. The incidence rates of all AEs and life-threatening AEs (LAE: death, cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac rupture) during exercise sessions were 12 and 1 event/383,096 patient-hours (3.13 and 0.26 events/100,000patient-hours), respectively. When CR programs were categorized as Formal in which an exercise prescription based on exercise testing was issued to individual patients or Non-formal without exercise prescription, the incidence of AEs during and within the 24 h after an exercise session was significantly lower in the Formal than the Non-formal CR programs (P<0.001), despite similar hospital size and coronary intervention volumes between the 2 category hospitals. Moreover, LAEs did not occur in 277,721 patient-hours in Formal CR, whereas 2 LAEs occurred in 105,375 patient-hours in Non-formal CR (P<0.05). During 469,215 exercise testing sessions, 3 LAEs (0.64 event/100,000tests) and 31 non-LAEs (6.61 events/100,000tests) occurred. Conclusions: This first nationwide survey in Japan revealed that both exercise-based CR and exercise testing are generally safe, and that Formal CR, in which an individual exercise prescription is determined by exercise testing, is particularly safe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据