4.5 Article

Thyroid and Brain Natriuretic Peptide Response in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease - Age-Related Variations and Prognostic Value

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 188-197

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0834

关键词

Brain natriuretic peptide; Cardiac surgery; Children; Thyroid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Interest in hormonal response after pediatric cardiac surgery is growing, but many aspects remain unclear. The aim of this study was to test age-related variations and prognostic values of thyroid hormones, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels before and after surgery. Methods and Results: A total of 162 children undergoing cardiac surgery were divided into 3 age groups (group 1, n=57 neonates; group 2, n=58 infants; group 3, n=47 toddlers). Free thyroid hormones (fT3 and fT4), thyrotropin (thyroid-stimulating hormone [ISH]) and BNP were measured preoperatively, daily postoperatively in the intensive care unit and after 15 days. The primary outcome was time to extubation (TTE; variable used as time to event by survival analysis). The hormonal response differed among age groups. In older children the TSH nadir occurred at 6-12h after surgery (0.42 mlU/L, P<0.001), with a progressive recovery thereafter, while in neonates the TSH nadir occurred later, at 36-60h (0.14 mlU/L, P<0.001), followed by a much slower recovery. In neonates, BNP also dropped after surgery (from 2,899 to 824.0 ng/L, P<0.001) while increased in older children (from 71.00 to 527.00 ng/L, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis independent predictors of TIE were fT3 nadir in all age groups, together with TSH nadir and Aristotle score in neonates, and body surface area and BNP peak in older children. Conclusions: BNP and thyroid response after pediatric cardiac surgery differs widely according to age. Beside Aristotle score, combined measurement of fT3 and TSH are the strongest predictors of TIE, especially in neonates. (Circ J 2013; 77: 188 197)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据