4.5 Article

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced vs. Preserved Ejection Fraction - Report From the Registry of Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 76, 期 7, 页码 1662-1669

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1355

关键词

Cardiovascular death; Ejection fraction; Heart failure; Outcome; Sudden death

资金

  1. Japanese Circulation Society
  2. Japanese Society of Heart Failure
  3. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular Diseases)
  4. Japan Heart Foundation
  5. Japan Arteriosclerosis Prevention Fund
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390192] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The mode of death has not been investigated in the registry data of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) vs. preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). The aim of the present study was therefore to carry out this comparison. Methods and Results: The Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD) prospectively studied the characteristics and treatments in a broad sample of 2,675 patients hospitalized with worsening HF, and followed them for an average of 2.1 years. This study included 323 patients in whom information on both the mode of death and left ventricular EF on echocardiography could be obtained. The mode of death was cardiovascular (CV) in 63% (including 17% sudden, 36% HF, 3% myocardial infarction, and 3% stroke), non-CV in 23%, and unknown in 14%. The prevalence of CV death including sudden death was high in patients with HFREF compared to HFPEF (68% vs. 58%, P=0.020). HF death, the most common mode of death, was similar between groups (37% vs. 35%, P=0.694). In contrast, non-CV mortality was significantly higher in HFPEF than those with HFREF (28% vs. 18%, P=0.021). Conclusions: In 60-70% of deaths the mode was CV, and HF death was the most common mode of death in either HFREF or HFPEF. The prevalence of sudden death was lower, and that of non-CV death higher, in HFPEF compared with HFREF. (Circ J 2012; 76: 1662-1669)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据