4.5 Article

Reduced ACTC1 Expression Might Play a Role in the Onset of Congenital Heart Disease by Inducing Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 2410-2418

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0234

关键词

Apoptosis; BcI-2; Cardiac alpha actin 1; Caspase-3; Congenital heart disease

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30400485]
  2. Liaoning Higher Education Project [20060951, 2008754]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Cardiac a actin 1 gene (ACTC1) has been related to familial atrial septal defects. This study was set to explore a potential role of this gene in the formation of sporadic congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods and Results: Assessment of cardiac tissue samples from 33 patients with sporadic CHD (gestational age (GA) 18 weeks-49 months) with real-time RT-PCR, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry has revealed a markedly decreased ACTC1 expression in the majority of samples (78.8%) compared with autopsied normal heart tissue from aged-matched subjects (GA 17 weeks-36 months). Also, as shown by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay, the proportion of apoptotic cardiomyocytes in samples featuring down-regulated ACTC1 expression (Group 1) was significantly greater than those with normal expression (Group 2) and the controls (P<0.01). The proportion of apoptotic cells strongly correlated with the expression of ACTC1 (r=-0.918, P<0.01). A study of 2 essential genes involved in apoptosis, Caspase-3 and BcI-2, confirmed that the former has significantly increased expression, whilst the latter has decreased expression in Group 1 than in the other groups (P<0.01). Transfection of a small interfering RNA targeting, Actc1 (Actc1-siRNA), to a cardiomyocyte cell line, H9C2, also detected more apoptotic cells. Conclusions: Reduced ACTC1 expression might play a role in the onset of CHD through induction of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. (Circ J 2010; 74: 2410-2418)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据