4.5 Article

Body Mass Index Is an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure in Japan - A Report From the Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD)

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 74, 期 12, 页码 2605-2611

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0599

关键词

Body mass index; Heart failure; Mortality; Obesity; Prognosis

资金

  1. Japanese the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular Diseases)
  2. Japan Heart Foundation
  3. Japan Arteriosclerosis Prevention Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is also associated with an increased risk of death in subjects without CVD. However, in heart failure (HF), elevated body mass index (BMI) has been shown to be associated with better prognosis, but it is unknown whether this is the case in unselected HF patients encountered in routine clinical practice in Japan. Methods and Results: The Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD) studied prospectively the characteristics and treatments in a broad sample of patients hospitalized with worsening HF and the outcomes were followed for 2.1 years. Study cohort (n=2,488) was classified into 3 groups according to baseline BMI <20.3 kg/m(2) (n=829), 20 3-23.49 kg/m(2) (n=832), and 23.5 kg/m(2) (n=827). The mean BMI was 22.3+/-4.1 kg/m(2). Patients with higher BMI had lower rates of all-cause death, cardiac death, and rehospitalization because of worsening HF After multivariable adjustment, the risk for all-cause death and cardiac death significantly increased with decreased BMI levels compared with patients with BMI 5 kg/m(2). However, BMI levels were not associated with rehospitalization for worsening HF. Conclusions: Lower BMI was independently associated with increased long-term all-cause, as well as cardiac, mortality in patients with HF encountered in routine clinical practice in Japan. (Circ J 2010; 74: 2605-2611)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据