4.5 Review

Mechanisms of Vein Graft Adaptation to the Arterial Circulation - Insights Into the Neointimal Algorithm and Management Strategies

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 1501-1512

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0495

关键词

Adaptation; Eph-B4; Nogo-B; Vein grafts; Veins

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01-HL095498-01]
  2. American Vascular Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For patients with coronary artery disease or limb ischemia, placement of a vein graft as a conduit for a bypass is an important and generally durable strategy among the options for arterial reconstructive surgery. Vein grafts adapt to the arterial environment, and the limited formation of intimal hyperplasia in the vein graft wall is thought to be an important component of successful vein graft adaptation. However, it is also known that abnormal, or uncontrolled, adaptation may lead to abnormal vessel wall remodeling with excessive neointimal hyperplasia, and ultimately vein graft failure and clinical complications. Therefore, understanding the venous-specific pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms of vein graft adaptation are important for clinical vein graft management. Of particular importance, it is currently unknown whether there exist several specific distinct molecular differences in the venous mechanisms of adaptation that are distinct from arterial post-injury responses; in particular, the participation of the venous determinant Eph-B4 and the vascular protective molecule Nogo-B may be involved in mechanisms of vessel remodeling specific to the vein. This review describes (1) venous biology from embryonic development to the mature quiescent state, (2) sequential pathologies of vein graft neointima formation, and (3) novel candidates for strategies of vein graft management. Scientific inquiry into venous-specific adaptation mechanisms will ultimately provide improvements in vein graft clinical outcomes. (Circ J 2010; 74: 1501-1512)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据