4.5 Article

Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor-1 Augments a Protein Kinase A-Dependent Increase in the Ca2+ Loading of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Without Changing Its Ca2+ Release

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 73, 期 6, 页码 1133-1140

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0871

关键词

Calyculin A; Inhibitor-1; Phospholamban; Protein phosphatases; Sarcoplasmic reticulum

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan [17590717, 20590858]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20590858, 17590717] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: An increase in cytosolic protein phosphatases (PPs) de-phosphorylates phospholamban, decreasing the Ca2+ uptake of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). The effects of PP inhibitors on cellular Ca2+ handling were investigated. Methods and Results: Twitch Ca2+ transients (CaTs) and cell shortening were measured in intact rat cardiac myocytes, and caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients (CaffCaTs) and Ca2+ sparks Were Studied in saponin-permeabilized cells. Calyculin A augmented isoproterenol-induced increases in CaTs and cell shortening without altering the diastolic [Ca2+]i and twitch [Ca2+]i decay. The protein kinase A catalytic subunit (PKAcat) increased the peak of CaffCaTs between 5 and 50 U/ml, and the addition of inhibitor-1 (I-1) augmented the increase. PKAcat increased Ca2+ spark frequency and the addition of I-1 increased it further. PKAcat at 50 U/ml amplified the peak and prolonged the duration of Ca2+ sparks, whereas the addition of I-I did not alter them. An abrupt inhibition of SR Ca2+ uptake following exposure to PKAcat caused a gradual decrease in Ca2+ spark frequency, but the addition of I-1 did not accelerate the decline of Ca2+ spark frequency or CaffCaTs. Conclusions: Inhibition of PPs augmented the inotropic effect of isoproterenol. Specific inhibition of PP I could stimulate the Ca2+ uptake of the SR with less significant effects on the Ca2+ release. (Circ J 2009; 73: 1133 1140)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据