4.5 Article

Combination of an ACE Inhibitor and Indapamide Improves Blood Pressure Control, but Attenuates the Beneficial Effects of ACE Inhibition on Plasma Adiponectin in Patients With Essential Hypertension

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 73, 期 12, 页码 2282-2287

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0387

关键词

Adiponectin; Combination therapy; Hypertension; Insulin resistance; Thiazides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Antihypertensive agents differentially influence the plasma adiponectin concentration and the effects of fixed-dose combination regimens remain unclear. The influence of a combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and a thiazide-type diuretic or all ACEI alone oil plasma adiponectin concentrations in patients with essential hypertension was evaluated in the present study. Methods and Results: After a 2-week placebo run-in phase, 30 patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive preterax (2 mg perindopril/0.625 mg indapamide) or cilazapril (2.5 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. Plasma adiponectin and insulin concentrations were measured before and after treatment. Insulin resistance was measured by homeostasis assessment index (HOMA-IR). Treatment with preterax (P=0.003) and cilazapril (P=0.031) significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (BP), but only preterax reduced diastolic BP (P=0.024). Cilazapril treatment significantly increased the plasma adiponectin concentration (P=0.025) and reduced plasma triglycerides (P=0.041), whereas preterax treatment increased the plasma insulin concentration (P=0.041) and tended to increase HOMA-IR. Conclusions: The combination of an ACET and indapamide improved BP control, but attenuated the beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on plasma adiponectin in patients with essential hypertension. Such a combination may be best reserved for improved BP control rather than for metabolic protection in clinical hypertension. (Circ J 2009; 73: 2282-2287)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据