4.5 Article

Importance of Rac1 Signaling Pathway Inhibition in the Pleiotropic Effects of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 361-370

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0817

关键词

Arteriosclerosis; Pleiotropic effects; Rho-kinase; Small GTPases; Statins

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan
  2. Pharmaceutical Safety and Research of Japan
  3. Technology Agency, CREST, Tokyo, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The pleiotropic effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are thought to be mediated through inhibition of small GTP-binding proteins; however, it remains to be examined whether clinical concentrations/doses of statins actually exert them. Methods and Results In vitro studies with cultured human umbilical venous endothelial cells found that statins (atorvastatin, pitavastatin and pravastatin at 10 mu mol/L) had no inhibitory effects on RhoA/Rho-kinase or Ras, but atorvastatin and pitavastatin inhibited membrane Rac1 expression. In animal Studies of angiotensin II (AngII)-infused rats, atorvastatin showed only mild inhibitory effects on AngII-induced cardiovascular hypertrophy, whereas fasudil, a selective Rho-kinase inhibitor, significantly suppressed it. Statins had no inhibitory effects on RhoA/ Rho-kinase, but inhibited both membrane and GTP-bound Rac1 in the heart, whereas fasudil only inhibited Rho-kinase activity. Furthermore, the combination of atorvastatin and fasudil showed more effective inhibitory effects than fasudil alone. Finally, in studies of normal healthy volunteers, clinical doses of pravastatin or atorvastatin (20 mg/day for 1 week) significantly inhibited Rac1, but not RhoA/Rho-kinase activity, in circulating leukocytes. Conclusions The pleiotropic effects of statins, if any, at their clinical doses are mediated predominantly through inhibition of the Rac1 signaling pathway. (Circ J 2009; 73: 361-370)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据