4.5 Article

Adipokines and the Prediction of the Accumulation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors or the Presence of Metabolic Syndrome in Elementary School Children

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 72, 期 11, 页码 1874-1878

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0180

关键词

Adipokines; Cardiovascular risk factors; Metabolic syndrome

资金

  1. Chiyoda Mutual Life Foundation 2005, the Health and Labour Science Research Grants [Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular Diseases] [17160501]
  2. Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants [Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular and Lifestyle Related Diseases ] [H18-049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Information is limited about how adipokines predict the accumulation of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors or the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) in children. Methods and Results The subjects were 321 children (200 boys and 121 girls; 109 normal and 212 obese) aged 6-12 years. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of >= the 95(th) percentile for age and sex. MS was defined by using the newly established Task Force criteria. The levels of the adipokines-adiponectin, leptin, ghrelin, high sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) and resistin-were measured. Regression analyses revealed that high leptin levels were predictive of the accumulation of CV risk factors in normal weight, obese, and entire (normal weight and obese) group of subjects. High CRP in the normal weight group and low adiponectin in the obese and the entire groups were also independently predictive of the accumulation of risk factors. A high leptin level was solely predictive of the presence of MS in obese and entire groups. Conclusions Leptin was the most sensitive marker for predicting the accumulation of CV risk factors and the presence of MS in elementary school children. Primary prevention is important because both leptin and adiponectin levels abruptly worsened when children obtained any I risk factor. (Circ J 2008; 72: 1874-1878)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据