4.8 Article

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Reperfusion With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial Subgroup Analysis

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 122, 期 21, 页码 2131-2141

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.927582

关键词

acute coronary syndrome; hemorrhage; myocardial infarction; platelets; thrombosis

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. sanofi-aventis
  3. Servier
  4. Astellas
  5. Bayer
  6. Boehringer-Ingelheim,
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Daiichi-Sankyo
  9. Endotis
  10. Glaxo Smith Kline
  11. Menarini
  12. Medtronic
  13. Merck-Sharpe-Dohme
  14. Nycomed
  15. Otsuka
  16. Pierre Fabre
  17. Schering Plough
  18. Eli-Lilly
  19. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  20. Novartis
  21. Merck
  22. Millenium Pharmaceuticals
  23. Medicines Co
  24. Pfizer
  25. Boston Scientific
  26. Regado Biosciences
  27. Daichii Sankyo
  28. Accumetrics
  29. Intekrin Therapeutics
  30. Merck/Schering Plough Partnership
  31. Takeda
  32. Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo Alliance
  33. Dynabyte
  34. Teva
  35. Regado
  36. Athera

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Aspirin and clopidogrel are recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing coronary stenting. Ticagrelor, a reversible oral P2Y12-receptor antagonist, provides faster, greater, and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and may be useful for patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Result-Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), a randomized, double-blind trial, compared ticagrelor with clopidogrel for the prevention of vascular events in 18 624 ACS patients. This report concerns the 7544 ACS patients with STE or left bundle-branch block allocated to either ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose (with provision for 300 mg clopidogrel at percutaneous coronary intervention) followed by 75 mg daily for 6 to 12 months. The reduction of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (10.8% versus 9.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.01; P=0.07) was consistent with the overall PLATO results. There was no interaction between presentation with STE/left bundle-branch block and randomized treatment (interaction P=0.29). Ticagrelor reduced several secondary end points, including myocardial infarction alone (HR, 0.80; P=0.03), total mortality (HR, 0.82; P=0.05), and definite stent thrombosis (HR, 0.66; P=0.03). The risk of stroke, low in both groups, was higher with ticagrelor (1.7% versus 1.0%; HR, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.48; P=0.02). Ticagrelor did not affect major bleeding (HR, 0.98; P=0.76). Conclusion-In patients with STE-ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the effects of ticagrelor were consistent with those observed in the overall PLATO trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据