4.8 Article

Prognostic Modeling of Individual Patient Risk and Mortality Impact of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Complications Assessment From the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 121, 期 1, 页码 43-51

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.878017

关键词

acute coronary syndrome; bleeding; modeling; myocardial infarction; risk score

资金

  1. The Medicines Company, Parsippany, NJ
  2. Nycomed, Roskilde, Denmark
  3. Boston Scientific
  4. Cordis
  5. Regado
  6. Therox
  7. sanofi-aventis
  8. Lilly
  9. Diachi Sankyo
  10. Medtronic
  11. Abbott
  12. Guebert
  13. Abiomed
  14. Bristol Myers Squibb
  15. CV Therapeutics
  16. Daiichi Sankyo
  17. Datascope
  18. Eli Lilly Company
  19. Schering-Plough
  20. Berlex
  21. Alexion
  22. NIH
  23. Pfizer
  24. Roche
  25. Johnson Johnson
  26. Shering Plough
  27. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  28. AstraZeneca
  29. GlaxoSmithKline
  30. Daichi Sankyo
  31. Neuren Pharmaceuticals
  32. Fournier Laboratories
  33. Procter Gamble
  34. Abbott Vascular

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications increase mortality rate in acute coronary syndromes. Their frequency and relative importance vary according to individual patient risk profiles. We sought to develop prognostic models for the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding to assess their impact on risk of death and to examine the manner in which alternative antithrombotic regimens affect these risks in individual patients. Methods and Results-The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial randomized 13 819 patients with acute coronary syndrome to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. By logistic regression, there were 5 independent predictors of MI within 30 days (n=705; 5.1%) and 8 independent predictors of major bleeding (n=645; 4.7%), only 2 of which were common to both event types. In a covariate-adjusted, time-updated Cox regression model, both MI and major bleeding significantly affected subsequent mortality rate (hazard ratios, 2.7 and 2.9, respectively; both P<0.001). Treatment with bivalirudin versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was associated with a nonsignificant 8% increase in MI and a highly significant 50% decrease in major bleeding. Given the individual patient risk profiles and the fact that bivalirudin prevented approximate to 6 major bleeds for each MI that might occur from its use, the estimated reduction in bleeding was greater than the estimated increase in MI by bivalirudin alone rather than heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor for nearly all patients. Conclusions-Consideration of the individual patient risk profile for MI and major bleeding and the relative treatment effects of alternative pharmacotherapies permits personalized decision making to optimize therapy of patients with acute coronary syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据