4.8 Article

Hemodynamic Support by Left Ventricular Assist Devices Reduces Cardiomyocyte DNA Content in the Failing Human Heart

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 121, 期 8, 页码 989-U24

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808071

关键词

heart-assist devices; heart failure; hypertrophy; pathology; remodeling

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ba 1730/9-1, BA 1730/10-1, Ba 1730/11-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Whether adult cardiomyocytes have the capacity to regenerate in response to injury and, if so, to what extent are still issues of intense debate. In human heart failure, cardiomyocytes harbor a polyploid genome. A unique opportunity to study the mechanism of polyploidization is provided through the setting of hemodynamic support by left ventricular assist devices. Hence, the cardiomyocyte DNA content, nuclear morphology, and number of nuclei per cell were assessed before and after left ventricular assist device support. Methods and Results-In 23 paired myocardial samples, cardiomyocyte ploidy was investigated by DNA image cytometry, flow cytometry, and in situ hybridization. Nuclear cross-sectional area and perimeters were measured morphometrically, and the binucleated cardiomyocytes were counted. The median of the cardiomyocyte DNA content and the number of polyploid cardiomyocytes both declined significantly from 6.79 c to 4.7 c and 40.2% to 23%, whereas a significant increase in diploid cardiomyocytes from 33.4% to 50.3% and in binucleated cardiomyocytes from 4.5% to 10% after unloading was observed. Conclusions-The decrease in polyploidy and increase in diploidy after left ventricular assist device suggest a numeric increase in diploid cardiomyocytes (eg, through cell cycle progression with completion of mitosis or by increased stem cells). The cardiac regeneration that follows may serve as a morphological correlate of the recovery observed in some patients after unloading. (Circulation. 2010; 121: 989-996.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据