4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of Different Types of Exercise Training Followed by Detraining on Endothelium-Dependent Dilation in Patients With Recent Myocardial Infarction

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 119, 期 12, 页码 1601-1608

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.821736

关键词

coronary disease; endothelium; exercise; myocardial infarction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-In coronary artery disease, exercise training ( ET) is associated with an improvement in endothelial function, but little is known about the relative effect of different types of training. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of different types of ET on endothelial function in 209 patients after a first recent acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-Endothelial function was evaluated before and after 4 weeks of different types of ET and after 1 month of detraining by measuring flow-mediated dilation and von Willebrand factor levels at baseline and after ET. Patients were randomized into 4 groups: group 1, aerobic ET (n = 52); group 2, resistance training (n = 54); group 3, resistance plus aerobic training (n = 53); and group 4, no training (n = 50). At baseline, flow-mediated dilation was 4.5 +/- 2.6% in group 1,4.01 +/- 1.6% in group 2,4.4 +/- 4% in group 3, and 4.3 +/- 2.3% in group 4 (P = NS). After ET, flow-mediated dilation increased to 9.9 +/- 2.5% in group 1, 10.1 +/- 2.6% in group 2, and 10.8 +/- 3% in group 3 (P < 0.01 versus baseline for all groups); it also increased in group 4 but to a much lesser extent (to 5.1 +/- 2.5%; P < 0.01 versus trained groups). The von Willebrand factor level after ET decreased by 16% (P < 0.01) similarly in groups 1, 2, and 3 but remained unchanged in group 4. Detraining returned flow-mediated dilation to baseline levels (P < 0.01 versus posttraining). Conclusion-In patients with recent acute myocardial infarction, ET was associated with improved endothelial function independently of the type of training, but this effect disappeared after 1 month of detraining. ( Circulation. 2009; 119: 1601-1608.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据