4.8 Article

Systems approach to understanding electromechanical activity in the human heart -: A national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop summary

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 118, 期 11, 页码 1202-1211

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.772715

关键词

arrhythmia; cardiovascular diseases; contractility; electrophysiology; mechanics

资金

  1. MRC [G9900432] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G9900432] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G9900432] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL082729-03, R01 HL063195, R01 HL064724, R01 HL082729, R01 HL085592, R01 HL064035, R01 HL063195-09] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened a workshop of cardiologists, cardiac electrophysiologists, cell biophysicists, and computational modelers on August 20 and 21, 2007, in Washington, DC, to advise the NHLBI on new research directions needed to develop integrative approaches to elucidate human cardiac function. The workshop strove to identify limitations in the use of data from nonhuman animal species for elucidation of human electromechanical function/activity and to identify what specific information on ion channel kinetics, calcium handling, and dynamic changes in the intracellular/extracellular milieu is needed from human cardiac tissues to develop more robust computational models of human cardiac electromechanical activity. This article summarizes the workshop discussions and recommendations on the following topics: (1) limitations of animal models and differences from human electrophysiology, (2) modeling ion channel structure/function in the context of whole-cell electrophysiology, ( 3) excitation-contraction coupling and regulatory pathways, (4) whole-heart simulations of human electromechanical activity, and (5) what human data are currently needed and how to obtain them. The recommendations can be found on the NHLBI Web site at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/electro.htm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据