4.8 Article

Bacteremia associated with toothbrushing and dental extraction

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 117, 期 24, 页码 3118-3125

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.758524

关键词

bacteremia; bacteria; infective endocarditis; valves; risk factors

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE013559-01A2, R01 DE013559, R01 DE013559-02, R01 DE13559-01, R01 DE013559-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations for the prevention of infective endocarditis are based in part on studies of bacteremia from dental procedures, but toothbrushing may pose a greater threat. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence, duration, nature, and magnitude of endocarditis-related bacteremia from single-tooth extraction and toothbrushing and to determine the impact of amoxicillin prophylaxis on single-tooth extraction. Methods and Results-In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 290 subjects were randomized to (1) toothbrushing, (2) single-tooth extraction with amoxicillin prophylaxis, or (3) single-tooth extraction with identical placebo. Blood was drawn for bacterial culturing and identification at 6 time points before, during, and after these interventions. The focus of our analysis was on bacterial species reported to cause infective endocarditis. We identified 98 bacterial species, 32 of which are reported to cause endocarditis. Cumulative incidence of endocarditis-related bacteria from all 6 blood draws was 23%, 33%, and 60% for the toothbrushing, extraction-amoxicillin, and extraction-placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Significant differences were identified among the 3 groups at draws 2, 3, 4, and 5 (all P < 0.05). Amoxicillin resulted in a significant decrease in positive cultures (P < 0.0001). Conclusions-Although amoxicillin has a significant impact on bacteremia resulting from a single-tooth extraction, given the greater frequency for oral hygiene, toothbrushing may be a greater threat for individuals at risk for infective endocarditis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据