4.7 Article

Parallel Epidemics of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 Infection in North and South America

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 212, 期 12, 页码 1874-1882

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiv320

关键词

USA300; USA300-LV; MRSA; epidemics

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01 AI093749, K08AI101005]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01 GM080602]
  3. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  4. Pediatric Infectious Disease Society/St. Jude Award
  5. John M. Driscoll, Jr, MD Children's Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) epidemic in the United States is attributed to the spread of the USA300 clone. An epidemic of CA-MRSA closely related to USA300 has occurred in northern South America (USA300 Latin-American variant, USA300-LV). Using phylogenomic analysis, we aimed to understand the relationships between these 2 epidemics. Methods. We sequenced the genomes of 51 MRSA clinical isolates collected between 1999 and 2012 from the United States, Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador. Phylogenetic analysis was used to infer the relationships and times since the divergence of the major clades. Results. Phylogenetic analyses revealed 2 dominant clades that segregated by geographical region, had a putative common ancestor in 1975, and originated in 1989, in North America, and in 1985, in South America. Emergence of these parallel epidemics coincides with the independent acquisition of the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) in North American isolates and a novel copper and mercury resistance (COMER) mobile element in South American isolates. Conclusions. Our results reveal the existence of 2 parallel USA300 epidemics that shared a recent common ancestor. The simultaneous rapid dissemination of these 2 epidemic clades suggests the presence of shared, potentially convergent adaptations that enhance fitness and ability to spread.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据