4.3 Article

Chronotype-dependent circadian rhythmicity of driving safety

期刊

CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 532-541

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2013.876427

关键词

Circadian rhythms; driving; eveningness; morningness; simulator; sleep

资金

  1. Fulbright Graduate Student Program
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP 2007-02965, EDU2010-21215]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity, Secretaria de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion [PSI2012-39292]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [INNPACTO IPT300000-2010-10]
  5. MEC [PS-2010-0667]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the factors associated with driving safety, sleep-related variables constitute a leading cause of road accidents. Circadian fluctuations of driver's somnolence has been previously linked to road safety. However, the role of chronotype in this relationship has been poorly investigated. Thus, the aim of the present work was to address whether driving performance is influenced by circadian patterns, in turn modulated by the driver's chronotype and the time of day (i.e. synchrony effect). We assessed 47 healthy young adults with specific chronotypes in several simulated driving sessions, both in the morning and in the evening. We collected driving performance data, along with self-reported levels of activation prior to each driving session and other sleep-related variables. Participants drove less safely when testing times took place outside their optimal time of day, as determined by their chronotype and confirmed by self-reported levels of activation. These differences were more pronounced in the morning, when morning types shown a better driving performance. Our results suggest that chronotype plays an important role as a modulator of the relationship between the time of day and driving safety. Therefore, it is necessary to acknowledge this variable in theoretical models of driving behavior, and for the improvement of occupational accidents prevention programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据