4.3 Review

Circadian Typology: A Comprehensive Review

期刊

CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 1153-1175

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971

关键词

Age; Circadian typology; Chronotype; Cognitive performance; Morningness-eveningness; Personality; Psychiatric disorders; Sex; Shiftwork

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PSI2009-12300]
  2. BBSRC [BB/F022883/1]
  3. AFOSR [FA-9550-08-1-0080]
  4. CAPES
  5. CNPq
  6. FAPERGS
  7. FIPE/ HCPA-Brasil
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F022883/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. BBSRC [BB/F022883/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interest in the systematic study of the circadian typology (CT) is relatively recent and has developed rapidly in the two last decades. All the existing data suggest that this individual difference affects our biological and psychological functioning, not only in health, but also in disease. In the present study, we review the current literature concerning the psychometric properties and validity of CT measures as well as individual, environmental and genetic factors that influence the CT. We present a brief overview of the biological markers that are used to define differences between CT groups (sleep-wake cycle, body temperature, cortisol and melatonin), and we assess the implications for CT and adjustment to shiftwork and jet lag. We also review the differences between CT in terms of cognitive abilities, personality traits and the incidence of psychiatric disorders. When necessary, we have emphasized the methodological limitations that exist today and suggested some future avenues of work in order to overcome these. This is a new field of interest to professionals in many different areas (research, labor, academic and clinical), and this review provides a state of the art discussion to allow professionals to integrate chronobiological aspects of human behavior into their daily practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据