4.2 Article

Magnetic Solid Phase Extraction Based on Modified Magnetite Nanoparticles Coupled with Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction as an Efficient Method for Simultaneous Extraction of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Drugs

期刊

CHROMATOGRAPHIA
卷 81, 期 11, 页码 1569-1578

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-018-3612-3

关键词

Hydrophobic drugs; Hydrophilic drugs; Magnetic solid phase extraction; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Desipramine; Venlafaxine; Clomipramine; Urine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, surfactant-coated Fe3O4@decanoic acid nanoparticleswas synthesized as a viable nanosorbent for coextraction of drugs with different polarities (hydrophobic, hydrophilic). To reach desirable enrichment factors, efficient clean-up and low limits of detection (LODs), the method was combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME). The coupling of these extraction methods with GC-FID detection was applied to simultaneous extraction and quantification of venlafaxine (VLF) as a hydrophilic model drug and desipramine (DESI) and clomipramine (CLO) as hydrophobic model drugs in urine samples. The effect of sample pH, nanosorbent amount, sorption time, surfactant concentration, eluent type, eluent volume, salt content, elution time in magnetic solid phase extraction step and extraction solvent and its volume along with sample pH in DLLME step were optimized. Under the selected conditions, linearity was achieved within the range of 5-5000 mu g L-1. The LOD values were obtained in the range of 1.5-3.0 mu g L-1 for DESI, 1.2-2.5 mu g L-1 for VLF and 2.0-4.0 mu g L-1 for CLO, respectively. The percent of extraction recoveries and relative standard deviations (n=5) were in the range of 82.4-95.9 and 6.1 for DESI, 60.5-92.8 and 6.9 for VLF and 57.2-58.0 and 5.5 for CLO, respectively. Ultimately, the applicability of the new method was successfully confirmed by the extraction and quantification of DESI, VLF and CLO from human urine samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据