4.7 Article

Macrolides Promote CCL2-Mediated Macrophage Recruitment and Clearance of Nasopharyngeal Pneumococcal Colonization in Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 212, 期 7, 页码 1150-1159

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiv157

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; macrolides; colonization; CCL2; macrophage

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26102737] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) colonizes mucosal surfaces of the upper respiratory tract (URT), resulting in invasive disease. Macrolides are known for their immunomodulatory effects. We investigated the potency of macrolides to reduce pneumococcal colonization by activating host innate immunity. Methods. The kinetics of colonization, cellular response, and inflammatory cytokine levels in the URT were assessed after nasal inoculation of pneumococci. EM900 (a novel 12-membered nonantibiotic macrolide with an immunomodulatory effect) was orally administered throughout the experiment. Survival was evaluated for 10 days. Macrolide-mediated CCL2 production from peritoneal macrophages was determined by enzyme-linked immuosorbent assay. The cell-signaling pathway was analyzed by means of Western blotting and gene silencing assays. Results. Streptococcus pneumoniae was significantly reduced from EM900-treated mice 14 days after pneumococcal inoculation. Macrophage recruitment and Ccl2 messenger RNA expression were promoted. CCL2 production from peritoneal macrophages was significantly induced by macrolides and was dependent on NF-kappa B phosphorylation through the myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88- or TIR domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-beta-mediated pathway. Mortality of mice with invasive pneumococcal disease was improved by pretreatment with EM900. Conclusions. Macrolides may inhibit invasive pneumococcal infections by accelerating the clearance of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal colonization via promotion of macrophage-mediated innate immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据