4.6 Article

Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Mitigate the Effects of Complement Attack by Endocytosis of C5b-9

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 195, 期 7, 页码 3382-3389

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500937

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust [093445]
  3. Fight for Sight Ph.D. studentship award
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I019707/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Fight for Sight [1833/84] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/M02282X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/I019707/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MR/M02282X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell death is a hallmark of age-related macular degeneration. The alternative pathway of complement activation is strongly implicated in RPE cell dysfunction and loss in age-related macular degeneration; therefore, it is critical that RPE cells use molecular strategies to mitigate the potentially harmful effects of complement attack. We show that the terminal complement complex C5b-9 assembles rapidly on the basal surface of cultured primary porcine RPE cells but disappears over 48 h without any discernable adverse effects on the cells. However, in the presence of the dynamin inhibitor dynasore, C5b-9 was almost completely retained at the cell surface, suggesting that, under normal circumstances, it is eliminated via the endocytic pathway. In support of this idea, we observed that C5b-9 colocalizes with the early endosome marker EEA1 and that, in the presence of protease inhibitors, it can be detected in lysosomes. Preventing the endocytosis of C5b-9 by RPE cells led to structural defects in mitochondrial morphology consistent with cell stress. We conclude that RPE cells use the endocytic pathway to prevent the accumulation of C5b-9 on the cell surface and that processing and destruction of C5b-9 by this route are essential for RPE cell survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据