4.6 Article

Critical Role and Therapeutic Control of the Lectin Pathway of Complement Activation in an Abortion-Prone Mouse Mating

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 195, 期 12, 页码 5602-5607

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501361

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Network of Excellence on Embryo Implantation Control, INSERM (France)
  2. Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata Grants) [RC 01/09, RC 08/13]
  3. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale PRIN) [MFXE7L_004]
  4. Fondazione Casali

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abortion-prone mating combination CBA/J x DBA/2 has been recognized as a model of preeclampsia, and complement activation has been implicated in the high rate of pregnancy loss observed in CBA/J mice. We have analyzed the implantation sites collected from DBA/2-mated CBA/J mice for the deposition of the complement recognition molecules using CBA/J mated with BALB/c mice as a control group. MBL-A was observed in the implantation sites of CBA/J x DBA/2 combination in the absence of MBL-C and was undetectable in BALB/c-mated CBA/J mice. Conversely, C1q was present in both mating combinations. Searching for other complement components localized at the implantation sites of CBA/J x DBA/2, we found C4 and C3, but we failed to reveal C1r. These data suggest that complement is activated through the lectin pathway and proceeds to completion of the activation sequence as revealed by C9 deposition. MBL-A was detected as early as 3.5 d of pregnancy, and MBL-A deficiency prevented pregnancy loss in the abortion-prone mating combination. The contribution of the terminal complex to miscarriage was supported by the finding that pregnancy failure was largely inhibited by the administration of neutralizing Ab to C5. Treatment of DBA/2-mated CBA/J mice with Polyman2 that binds to MBL-A with high affinity proved to be highly effective in controlling the activation of the lectin pathway and in preventing fetal loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据