4.6 Article

Cell-Intrinsic Expression of TLR9 in Autoreactive B Cells Constrains BCR/TLR7-Dependent Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 6, 页码 2504-2512

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402425

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases/National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant [AR050256]
  2. Department of the Army Grant [PR120610]
  3. NIH Training Grant [T32 AI-055428]
  4. NIH intramural program
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25253032] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endosomal TLRs play an important role in systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic erythematosus lupus, in which DNA-and RNA-associated autoantigens activate autoreactive B cells through TLR9- and TLR7-dependent pathways. Nevertheless, TLR9-deficient autoimmune-prone mice develop more severe clinical disease, whereas TLR7-deficient and TLR7/9-double deficient autoimmune-prone mice develop less severe disease. To determine whether the regulatory activity of TLR9 is B cell intrinsic, we directly compared the functional properties of autoantigen-activated wild-type, TLR9-deficient, and TLR7-deficient B cells in an experimental system in which proliferation depends on BCR/TLR coengagement. In vitro, TLR9-deficient cells are less dependent on survival factors for a sustained proliferative response than are either wild-type or TLR7-deficient cells. The TLR9-deficient cells also preferentially differentiate toward the plasma cell lineage, as indicated by expression of CD138, sustained expression of IRF4, and other molecular markers of plasma cells. In vivo, autoantigen-activated TLR9-deficient cells give rise to greater numbers of autoantibody-producing cells. Our results identify distinct roles for TLR7 and TLR9 in the differentiation of autoreactive B cells that explain the capacity of TLR9 to limit, as well as TLR7 to promote, the clinical features of systemic erythematosus lupus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据