4.6 Article

A Novel Glycolipid Antigen for NKT Cells That Preferentially Induces IFN-γ Production

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 195, 期 3, 页码 924-933

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500070

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI045053, AI071922, AI074952, AI107318, AI091987, AI045889]
  2. University of California, San Diego Rheumatology T32 Grant [AR064194]
  3. MRC [G1001750] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G1001750] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we characterize a novel Ag for invariant NKT (iNKT) cells capable of producing an especially robust Th1 response. This glycosphingolipid, DB06-1, is similar in chemical structure to the well-studied a-galactosylceramide (alpha GalCer), with the only change being a single atom: the substitution of a carbonyl oxygen with a sulfur atom. Although DB06-1 is not a more effective Ag in vitro, the small chemical change has a marked impact on the ability of this lipid Ag to stimulate iNKT cells in vivo, with increased IFN-gamma production at 24 h compared with aGalCer, increased IL-12, and increased activation of NK cells to produce IFN-gamma. These changes are correlated with an enhanced ability of DB06-1 to load in the CD1d molecules expressed by dendritic cells in vivo. Moreover, structural studies suggest a tighter fit into the CD1d binding groove by DB06-1 compared with alpha GalCer. Surprisingly, when iNKT cells previously exposed to DB06-1 are restimulated weeks later, they have greatly increased IL-10 production. Therefore, our data are consistent with a model whereby augmented and or prolonged presentation of a glycolipid Ag leads to increased activation of NK cells and a Th1-skewed immune response, which may result, in part, from enhanced loading into CD1d. Furthermore, our data suggest that strong antigenic stimulation in vivo may lead to the expansion of IL-10-producing iNKT cells, which could counteract the benefits of increased early IFN-gamma production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据