4.6 Article

Contact-Dependent Depletion of Hydrogen Peroxide by Catalase Is a Novel Mechanism of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Induction Operating in Human Hepatic Stellate Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 6, 页码 2578-2586

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401046

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant [RE 2776/2-1]
  2. Liver Foundation Trust
  3. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research-Trust Erlangen/Germany
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10080] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) represent a unique cell population with distinct immunosuppressive properties that have been demonstrated to shape the outcome of malignant diseases. Recently, human hepatic stellate cells (HSC) have been reported to induce monocytic-MDSC from mature CD14(+) monocytes in a contact-dependent manner. We now report a novel and unexpected mechanism by which CD14(+)HLADR(low/-) suppressive cells are induced by catalase-mediated depletion of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Incubation of CD14(+) monocytes with catalase led to a significant induction of functional MDSC compared with media alone, and H2O2 levels inversely correlated with MDSC frequency (r = -0.6555, p < 0.05). Catalase was detected in primary HSC and a stromal cell line, and addition of the competitive catalase inhibitor hydroxylamine resulted in a dose-dependent impairment of MDSC induction and concomitant increase of H2O2 levels. The NADPH-oxidase subunit gp91 was significantly increased in catalase-induced MDSC as determined by quantitative PCR outlining the importance of oxidative burst for the induction of MDSC. These findings represent a so far unrecognized link between immunosuppression by MDSC and metabolism. Moreover, this mechanism potentially explains how stromal cells can induce a favorable immunological microenvironment in the context of tissue oxidative stress such as occurs during cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据