4.6 Article

IFN-β Treatment Requires B Cells for Efficacy in Neuroautoimmunity

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 5, 页码 2110-2116

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402029

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Grant [R00 NS075099-04]
  2. National Institutes of Health Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence Grant [P30 GM103510]
  3. Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources Grant [U54 GM104938]
  4. Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence Grant [U19 AI082714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IFN-beta remains the most widely prescribed treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Despite widespread use of IFN-beta, the therapeutic mechanism is still partially understood. Particularly, the clinical relevance of increased B cell activity during IFN-beta treatment is unclear. In this article, we show that IFN-beta pushes some B cells into a transitional, regulatory population that is a critical mechanism for therapy. IFN-beta treatment increases the absolute number of regulatory CD19(+)CD24(++)CD38(++) transitional B cells in peripheral blood relative to treatment-naive and Copaxone-treated patients. In addition, we found that transitional B cells from both healthy controls and IFN-beta-treated MS patients are potent producers of IL-10, and that the capability of IFN-beta to induce IL-10 is amplified when B cells are stimulated. Similar changes are seen in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. IFN-beta treatment increases transitional and regulatory B cell populations, as well as IL-10 secretion in the spleen. Furthermore, we found that IFN-beta increases autoantibody production, implicating humoral immune activation in B cell regulatory responses. Finally, we demonstrate that IFN-beta therapy requires immune-regulatory B cells by showing that B celldeficient mice do not benefit clinically or histopathologically from IFN-beta treatment. These results have significant implications for the diagnosis and treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据