4.1 Article

Effects of Transient Receptor Potential-Like Current on the Firing Pattern of Action Potentials in the Hodgkin-Huxley Neuron during Exposure to Sinusoidal External Voltage

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 423-429

出版社

CHINESE PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.4077/CJP.2010.AMM026

关键词

Hodgkin-Huxley model; transient receptor potential (TRP); action potential; computer simulations

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC-94-2320B-006-019]
  2. Ministry of Education, Taiwan, ROC
  3. Cardiac Electrophysiology and Systems-biology Center
  4. National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) channels play a role in several inflammatory and nociceptive processes. Previous work showed that magnetic electrical field-induced antinoceptive action is mediated by activation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory afferents. In this study, a modified Hodgkin-Huxley model, in which TRP-like current (I-TRP) was incorporated, was implemented to predict the firing behavior of action potentials (APs), as the model neuron was exposed to sinusoidal changes in externally-applied voltage. When model neuron is exposed to low-frequency sinusoidal voltage, increased maximal conductance of I-TRP can enhance repetitive bursts of APs accompanied by a shortening of inter-spike interval (ISI) in AP firing. The change in ISIs with number of interval is periodic with the phase-locking. In addition, increased maximal conductance of I-TRP can abolish chaotic pattern of AP firing in model neuron during exposure to high-frequency voltage. The ISI pattern is converted from irregular to constant, as maximal conductance of ITRP is increased under such high-frequency voltage. Our simulation results suggest that modulation of TRP-like channels functionally expressed in small-diameter peripheral sensory neurons should be an important mechanism through which it can contribute to the firing pattern of APs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据