4.6 Article

CD14++CD16+ Monocytes Are Enriched by Glucocorticoid Treatment and Are Functionally Attenuated in Driving Effector T Cell Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 11, 页码 5150-5160

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402409

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust
  3. University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human peripheral monocytes have been categorized into three subsets based on differential expression levels of CD14 and CD16. However, the factors that influence the distribution of monocyte subsets and the roles that each subset plays in autoimmunity are not well studied. In this study, we show that circulating monocytes from patients with autoimmune uveitis exhibit a skewed phenotype toward intermediate CD14(++)CD16(+) cells, and that this is associated with glucocorticoid therapy. We further demonstrate that CD14(++) CD16(+) monocytes from patients and healthy control donors share a similar cell-surface marker and gene expression profile. Comparison of the effects of intermediate CD14(++)CD16(+) monocytes with classical CD14(++)CD16(-) and nonclassical CD14(+)CD16(++) monocytes revealed that the intermediate CD14(++)CD16(+) subset had an attenuated capacity to promote both naive CD4(+) T cell proliferation and polarization into a Th1 phenotype, and memory CD4(+) T cell proliferation and IL-17 expression. Furthermore, CD14(++)CD16(+) cells inhibit CD+ T cell proliferation induced by other monocyte subsets and enhance CD4(+) T regulatory cell IL-10 expression. These data demonstrate the impact of glucocorticoids on monocyte phenotype in the context of autoimmune disease and the differential effects of monocyte subsets on effector T cell responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据