4.5 Article

Effects of panax notoginoside on the nephropathy in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 612-615

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-011-0825-9

关键词

type 1 diabetes; diabetic nephropathy; Panax notoginoside

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To explore the effects and underlying mechanisms of Panax notoginoside (PNS) on the nephropathy in rats with type 1 diabetes. A murine model of diabetic nephropathy was set up by an intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ). Wistar rats were randomly divided into 5 groups: the control group, the diabetic group (DM), the group treated with low-dosage PNS (PNS-L), the group treated with high-dosage PNS (PNS-H) and the group treated with catopril. Rats in the PNS-L and PNS-H groups were given different dosages of PNS while rats in the catopril group were given catopril through gastrogavage every day for the next four consecutive weeks. Serum creatinine (Cr) levels, endogenous creatinine clearance rate (CCr), and 24-h urinary microalbumin (UAlb) were examined and calculated. Meanwhile, immunohistochemistry was applied to determine the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) in the kidney tissue. The levels of Cr, Ccr, and UAlb were all elevated significantly in the DM group (P < 0.01). The expression of VEGF protein was increased but BMP-7 protein was decreased in the kidney tissue (P < 0.01). However, the above items decreased in the PNS-L, PNS-H and catopril groups compared with the DM group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). In the PNS-L, PNS-H and catopril groups, the expression of VEGF protein was decreased but BMP-7 protein was increased in the kidney tissue (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). PNS shows protective effects on the kidney in type 1 diabetic rats at the early stage. The protective mechanism might be closely related to its role of inhibiting the expression of VEGF protein and enhancing the expression of BMP-7 protein in the kidney.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据