4.5 Article

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Artemisinin-piperaquine vs Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine Phosphate in Treatment of Falciparum Malaria

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 189-192

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-009-0189-6

关键词

plasmodium falciparum; malaria; artemisinin; piperaquine; antimalarials; randomized controlled trial

资金

  1. Science and Technology Research Projects of Guangdong Province [2005A30101009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine phosphate (Artekin) and artemisinin-piperaquine (Artequick) in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Methods: A total of 103 uncomplicated falciparum malaria patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: 52 cases in the Artequick group, and 51 cases in the Artekin group. The patients in the Artequick group were administered with Artequick, twice in 24 h, whereas the patients in the Artekin group were given Artekin 4 times in 2 days. The mean parasite clearance time, mean fever clearance time, 28-day cure rate and parasite recrudescence rates of the two groups were then compared. Results: The mean parasite clearance time and the mean fever clearance time were 43.2 +/- 13.9 h and 24.7 +/- 9.9 h, in the Artequick group, and 36.5 +/- 17.1 h and 22.7 +/- 11.2 h, in the Artekin group. In both groups the 28-day cure rate was 100%, and the parasite recrudescence rate was 0. Conclusion: Both medicines had high cure rates, low recrudescence rates, and no serious adverse reactions. The administration of Artequick, however, was more convenient and lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects than that of Artekin, so as to increase the efficacy in the malaria population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据