4.5 Article

Effect of Jinmaitong Serum on the Proliferation of Rat Schwann Cells Cultured in High Glucose Medium

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 293-297

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-008-0293-z

关键词

Schwann cells; high glucose; primary culture; Jinmaitong; proliferation; Chinese herbs' serum pharmacology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the effect of Jinmaitong (JMT) serum on the proliferation of rat Schwann cells (SCs) primarily cultured in high glucose medium. Method: SCs were primarily cultured in Dulbecco's minmum essential medium (DMEM control), 50 mmol/L glucose medium (50 mmol/L Glu), 75 mmol/L glucose medium (75 mmol/L Glu), as well as 50 mmol/L glucose medium, with different concentrations of JMT serum (undiluted, 1:2 diluted and 1:8 diluted) and Neurotropin (Ntp), respectively. The proliferation of SCs under different conditions was detected by MTT. Result: SCs grew exuberantly in DMEM within 24-72 h, but slowed down at 96 h. The proliferation of SCs was inhibited in 50 mmol/L Glu and 75 mmol/L Glu after cultures of 48, 72 and 96 In, which showed that both were significantly different compared to the control group (P<0.01). The inhibition was more significant in 75 mmol/L Glu than in 50 mmollL Glu (P<0.05). Spearman's rho analysis revealed that the proliferation of SCs had a negative correlation with the concentration of glucose (r=-0.471, P<0.01). Excluding the time factor, partial correlation showed similar results (r=-0.679, P<0.01). After 48 h, the proliferation of SCs increased significantly in JMT1:2 and Ntp compared with 50 mmol/L Glu (control 0.437 +/- 0.019, 50 mmol/L Glu 0.367 +/- 0.035, JMT1:2 0.426 +/- 0.024, Ntp 0.422 +/- 0.013; P<0.01), and there were no statistically significant differences among the JMT groups, the Ntp group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusions: The proliferation of SCs was inhibited in high glucose medium, and the inhibition was reduced by different concentrations of JMT serum, especially at JMT1:2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据