4.5 Article

Thermal conductivity of natural rubber nanocomposites with hybrid fillers

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 928-934

出版社

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.09.019

关键词

Modified carbon nanotube; Carbon black; Hybrid filler; Natural rubber; Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606107, 51576102]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Project of Green Tire and Rubber [0200501436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural rubber nanocomposites filled with hybrid fillers of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon black (CB) were prepared. CNTs were ultrasonically modified in mixture of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and distilled water (H2O). The functional groups on the surface of CNTs, changes in nanotube structure and morphology were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Raman Spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It shows that hydroxyl (OH.) is successfully introduced. The surface defects of modified CNTs were obviously higher than those of original CNTs, and the degree of agglomeration was greatly reduced. Thermal conductivity of the composites was tested by protection heat flow meter method. Compared with unmodified CNTs/CB filling system, the thermal conductivity of hybrid composites is improved by an average of 5.8% with 1.5 phr (phr is parts per hundred rubber) of hydroxyl CNTs and 40 phr of CB filled. A three-dimensional heat conduction network composed of hydroxyl CNTs and CB, as observed by TEM, contributes to the good properties. Thermal conductivity of the hybrid composites increases as temperature rises. The mechanical properties of hybrid composites are also good with hydroxyl CNTs filled nanocomposites; the tensile strength, 100% and 300% tensile stress are improved by 10.1%, 22.4% and 26.2% respectively. (C) 2018 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据