4.7 Article

Structure, rheology and electrospinning of zein and poly(ethylene oxide) in aqueous ethanol solutions

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 305-310

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.07.010

关键词

Small angle X-ray scattering; Zein; Poly(ethylene oxide); Viscosity; Electrospin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21374117, 21774128]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program [2015CB655302]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences [QYZDY-SSW-SLH027]
  4. One Hundred Person Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospun fiber mats (EFM) integrated proteins and biocompatible polymers have been widely used as tissue scaffold, wound dressing and food packaging. The morphology of EFM has strong correlation with the structure and rheology of the solutions. We studied the structure and rheology of polyethylene oxide (PEO) and zein in 80% ethanol aqueous solutions and the resulted EFM. In solutions, zein with rod-like conformation tends to aggregate and form oligomer, the number of proteins in the oligomer spans from 2.5 to 55.2, while PEO always behaves like Gaussian chain in good solvent. Zein preferred to distribute along PEO chains in their mixed solutions, and the structures decomposed from small angle X-ray scattering have consistent relaxation spatial-temporal characteristics with rheological behaviors. Further, the aging of zein solutions enhanced shear thinning and resulted thicker fibers in EFM, which are attributed to the rod-like growth of zein aggregates. Aggregates in viscous media with long enough relaxation time are probably crucial for the formation of continuous electrospun fibers or ribbons. This study provides a clear correlation of the structure, rheology of solutions with the morphologies of EFM made up of proteins and polymers. (C) 2018 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据