4.1 Article

The effects of temozolomide delivered by prolonged intracerebral microinfusion against the rat brainstem GBM allograft model

期刊

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 707-713

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1732-x

关键词

Brainstem; Glioma; Animal model; Convection-enhanced delivery; Temozolomide; Pontine glioma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse intrinsic brainstem gliomas are considered to be inoperable. We report our initial experience of temozolomide (TMZ) administration into brainstem by intracerebral (i.c.) microinfusion using a rat brainstem glioblastoma allograft model. Forty-eight Fischer 344 female rats were used. In a feasibility study, various doses of i.c.-TMZ (1-10 mg) were administered into the brainstem using AlzetTM pumps in order to evaluate survival rates and neurotoxicity. For tumor implantation, rats received an injection of 10(5) 9 L gliosarcoma cells. For local therapy, 5 days after inoculation, a total amount of 1 mg of TMZ or saline was administered into the brainstem at 1 mu l/h over 7 days (n = 8/group). For systemic therapy, rats were treated with an orally administered maximum daily dose of 50 mg/kg TMZ for 5 consecutive days. Survival time and neurological deficit were recorded as outcome parameters. In the neurotoxicity study, low dose TMZ (1 mg) was feasible to be administered into brainstem over 7 days without neurological deficit. Using high dose TMZ (5-10 mg), marked neurotoxic effect was observed. In the brainstem tumor study, survival was significantly prolonged in low dose i.c.-TMZ group compared to control rats (median survival 23.5 versus 29.5 days; p < 0.01). Systemic therapy with maximal oral-TMZ dose resulted in longer survival time compared to low dose i.c.-TMZ group (median survival 33.5 versus 29.5 days; p < 0.01). i.c.-TMZ is feasible and effective against rat brainstem glioblastoma allograft. However, we could not show superior potential of i.c.-TMZ compared to oral-TMZ administration. Modification of TMZ infusion with systemic therapy warrants future investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据