4.7 Article

Surfactant Protein B Gene Polymorphism Is Associated With Severe Influenza

期刊

CHEST
卷 145, 期 6, 页码 1237-1243

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1651

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health and Medical Research Fund of the Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong SAR Government [13120842]
  2. Providence Foundation Limited

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Surfactant proteins play a key role in alveolar stability. We examined whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to the surfactant protein genes are associated with severe influenza. Methods: In the first cohort, 12 SNPs related to surfactant protein genes were compared between Chinese patients with severe and mild pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) (A[H1N1] pdm09) infection who were matched for age, sex, and underlying risk conditions. The SNP rs1130866, which was significantly different between the two groups, was further genotyped in a second cohort of patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding factors. The genotype frequencies were also compared with those of the general Han Chinese population. Results: This study consisted of 380 patients with A(H1N1) pdm09 infection. In the first cohort of 84 patients, the C allele of rs1130866, an SNP in the surfactant protein B gene (SFTPB), was significantly associated with severe disease (OR = 3.37, P = .0048), although the P value was .057 after Bonferroni correction. In the second cohort of 296 patients, the C/C genotype was confirmed in the univariate analysis to be associated with severe disease. Multivariate analysis of the second cohort showed that genotype C/C was an independent risk factor for severe A(H1N1) pdm09 infection (second cohort: OR = 2.087, P = .023). Compared to the general Han Chinese population, the C/C genotype was overrepresented in patients with severe A(H1N1) pdm09 infection (OR = 3.232, P = .000000=6). Conclusions: SFTPB polymorphism is associated with severe infl uenza. The role of SFTPB in infl uenza warrants further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据