4.7 Article

Lung Size Mismatch in Bilateral Lung Transplantation is Associated With Allograft Function and Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

期刊

CHEST
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 451-460

出版社

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-0767

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Size mismatch between donor lungs and a recipient thorax could affect the major determinants of maximal expiratory airflow: airway resistance, propensity of airways to collapse, and lung elastic recoil. Methods: A retrospective review of 159 adults who received bilateral lung transplants was performed. The predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) for donors and recipients was calculated based on sex and height. Size matching was represented using the following formula: pTLC ratio = donor pTLC/recipient pTLC. Patients were grouped according to those with a pTLC ratio > 1.0 (oversized) or those with a pTLC ratio 1.0 (undersized). Allograft function was analyzed in relation to the pTLC ratio and to recipient and donor predicted function. Results: The 96 patients in the oversized cohort had a mean pTLC ratio of 1.16 +/- 0.13 vs 0.89 +/- 0.09 in the 63 patients of the undersized group. At 1 to 6 months posttransplant, the patients in the oversized cohort had higher FEV1/FVC ratios (0.895 +/- 0.13 vs 0.821 +/- 0.13, P < .01) and lower time constant estimates of lung emptying (0.38 +/- 0.2 vs 0.64 +/- 0.4, P < .01) than patients in the undersized cohort. Although the FVCs expressed as % predicted for the recipient were not different between cohorts, the FVCs expressed as % predicted for the donor organ were lower in the oversized cohort compared with the undersized cohort (at 1-6 months, 52.4% +/- 17.1% vs 65.3% 18.3%, P < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimates for the occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) showed that patients in the oversized cohort had a lower probability of BOS (P < .001). Conclusions: A pTLC ratio > 1.0, suggestive of an oversized allograft, is associated with higher expiratory airflow capacity and a less frequent occurrence of BOS. CHEST 2012; 141(2):451-460

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据