4.7 Article

Portopulmonary Hypertension A Report From the US-Based REVEAL Registry

期刊

CHEST
卷 141, 期 4, 页码 906-915

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-0160

关键词

-

资金

  1. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.
  2. Actelion
  3. Gilead
  4. Eli Lilly and Co
  5. NIH/NHLBI
  6. Novartis
  7. Pfizer
  8. United Therapeutics
  9. Cleveland Clinic
  10. NASA
  11. NIH
  12. State of Ohio
  13. Encysive Pharmaceuticals
  14. Lung Ex
  15. Eh Lilly and Co
  16. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated survival and hospitalization rates in patients with group 1 portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL Registry). Methods: The REVEAL Registry is a multicenter, observational, US-based study evaluating demographics and management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Outcomes were examined using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event estimates and compared with patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH) or familial PAH (FPAH). Results: One hundred seventy-four patients with PoPH were enrolled in the REVEAL Registry (IPAH/FPAH; n = 1,478). from March 2006 to December 2009. Mean age was 53 +/- 10 years, 52% were female, 32% were newly diagnosed, and 6% were New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class IV. Outcome parameters were worse for PoPH vs IPAH/FPAH, respectively: 2-year survival from enrollment (67% vs 85%, P < .001), 5-year survival from time of diagnosis (40% vs 64%, p < .001), and 2-year freedom from all-cause hospitalization (49% vs 59%, P = .019). However, despite worse outcomes, hemodynamic parameters at diagnosis were better for PoPH vs IPAH/FPAH, respectively: mean pulmonary artery pressure (49 mm Hg vs 53 mm Hg, P < .001), mean right atrial pressure (9 mm Hg vs 10 mm Hg, P = .005), pulmonary vascular resistance (8 Wood units vs 12 Wood units, P < .001), and cardiac output (5 L/min vs 4 L/min, P < .001). Compared with patients with IPAH/FPAH, patients with PoPH were less likely to be on a PAH-specific therapy at enrollment (P < .001), suggesting potential delays in therapy for patients with PoPH. Conclusions: Patients with PoPH had significantly poorer survival and all-cause hospitalization rates compared with patients with IPAH/FPAH, despite having better hemodynamics at diagnosis. Further studies should investigate such outcomes and differences in treatment patterns. Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov CHEST 2012; 141(4):906-915

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据