4.7 Article

Preventive and Therapeutic Effects of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Inhibitors on Acute Lung Injury

期刊

CHEST
卷 140, 期 2, 页码 391-400

出版社

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-3060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science & Technology Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2010C14011]
  2. Science & Technology Bureau of Wenzhou [H20100013]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B115]
  4. Fudan University
  5. Shanghai Science & Technology Committee [08PJ1402900, 9540702600, 08DZ2293104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) are involved in a number of biologic responses. Recent preclinical studies demonstrated that the PI3K-dominant signal pathway could play an important role in the development of acute lung injury, although the mechanism remains unclear. Methods: CD-1 mice were administered different PI3K inhibitors either intranasally or intragastrically once a day for 3 days before intratracheal instillation of lipopolysaccharide at 4 h and 24 h. Effects of SHBM1009 on lipopolysaccharide-induced capillary permeability, leukocyte distribution and activation, and epithelial cell function were measured. Therapeutic effects of SHBM1009 on pancreatic elastase-induced lung injury were evaluated in rats. Results: The data demonstrated that the local delivery of PI3K inhibitors played more effective roles in the prevention of endotoxin-induced lung injury than the systemic delivery. The preventive effects of PI3K inhibitors varied most likely because of chemical properties, targeting sites, and pharmacokinetics. The local PI3K inhibitors prevented both endotoxin- and elastase-induced lung injury in mice and rats, possibly through directly inhibiting or inactivating the function of airway epithelial cells, which could not produce chemoattractant factors to activate neutrophils and macrophages. Conclusions: PI3K may be a therapeutic target for lung injury, and local delivery of PI3K inhibitors may be one of the optimal approaches for the therapy. CHEST 2011; 140(2):391-400

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据