4.7 Article

Extubation of Patients With Neuromuscular Weakness A New Management Paradigm

期刊

CHEST
卷 137, 期 5, 页码 1033-1039

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-2144

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Successful extubation conventionally necessitates the passing of spontaneous breathing trials (SETs) and ventilator weaning parameters. We report successful extubation of patients with neuromuscular disease (NMD) and weakness who could not pass them. Methods: NMD-specific extubation criteria and a new extubation protocol were developed. Data were collected on 157 consecutive unweanable patients, including 83 transferred from other hospitals who refused tracheostomies. They could not pass the SBTs before or after extubation. Once the pulse oxyhemoglobin saturation (Spo(2)) was maintained at >= 95% in ambient air, patients were extubated to full noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NW) support and aggressive mechanically assisted coughing (MAC). Rather than oxygen, NW and MAC were used to maintain or return the Spo(2) to >= 95%. Extubation success was defined as not requiring reintubation during the hospitalization and was considered as a function of diagnosis, preintubation NW experience, and vital capacity and assisted cough peak flows (CPF) at extubation. Results: Before hospitalization 96 (61%) patients had no experience with NW, 41 (26%) used it <24 h per day, and 20 (13%) were continuously NW dependent. The first-attempt protocol extubation success rate was 95% (149 patients). All 98 extubation attempts on patients with assisted CPF >= 160 L/m were successful. The dependence on continuous NW and the duration of dependence prior to intubation correlated with extubation success (P < .005). Six of eight patients who initially failed extubation succeeded on subsequent attempts, so only two with no measurable assisted CPF underwent tracheotomy. Conclusions: Continuous volume-cycled NW via oral interfaces and masks and MAC with oximetry feedback in ambient air can permit safe extubation of unweanable patients with NMD. CHEST 2010; 137(5):1033-1039

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据