4.7 Article

Update in the understanding of respiratory limitations to exercise performance in fit, active adults

期刊

CHEST
卷 134, 期 3, 页码 613-622

出版社

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-2730

关键词

exercise; hypoxemia; physiology; pulmonary

资金

  1. National Heart, Long, and Blood Institute
  2. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review addresses three types of causes of respiratory system limitations to O-2 transport and exercise performance that are experienced by significant numbers of active, highly fit younger and older adults. First, flow limitation in intrathoracic airways may occur during exercise because of narrowed, hyperactive airways or secondary to excessive ventilatory demands superimposed on a normal maximum flow-volume envelope. Narrowing of the extrathoracic, upper airway, also occurs in some athletes at very high flow rates during heavy exercise. Examination of the breath-by-breath tidal flow-volume loop during exercise is key to a noninvasive diagnosis of flow limitation and to differentiation between intrathoracic and extrathoracic airway narrowing. Second exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia occurs secondary to an excessively widened alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference. This inefficient gas exchange may be attributable in part to small intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunts of deoxygenated mixed venous blood during exercise. The existence of these shunts at rest and during exercise may, be determined by using saline solution contrast echocardiography. Finally, fatigue of the respiratory muscles resulting from sustained, high-intensity exercise and the resultant vasoconstrictor effects on limb muscle vasculature will also compromise O-2 transport and performance. Exercise in the hypoxic environments of even moderately high alitudes will greatly exacerbate the negative influences of these respiratory, system limitations to exercise performance, especially in highly, fit individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据