4.7 Article

The effect of previous tuberculin skin test on the follow-up examination of whole-blood interferon-γ assay in the screening for latent tuberculosis infection

期刊

CHEST
卷 133, 期 6, 页码 1415-1420

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-2193

关键词

interferon-gamma assay; latent tuberculosis; tuberculin skin test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A two-step procedure using a tuberculin skin test (TST) followed by an interferon (IFN)-gamma assay in cases in which the TST result is positive has been advocated to screen for latent tuberculosis infection. However, TST could also boost the in vitro immune response. In this study, we evaluated the effect of TST on the results of the IFN-gamma assay. Methods: Our study included 84 health-care workers who had been working in the department of pulmonary medicine for > 1 year. First, a whole-blood IFN-gamma assay was performed, and then the TST was applied. Two to 4 weeks later, a follow-up IFN-gamma assay was performed. A commercially available IFN-gamma assay (QuantiFERON-TB GOLD; Cellestis Ltd; Carnegie, VIC, Australia) was used. Results: Valid TST results were available in 82 individuals because 2 participants refused to undergo the TST after the IFN-gamma assay. The TST result was positive in 36 of 82 participants (42.7%), and the IFN-gamma assay was positive in 16 of 82 participants (19.5%). The overall agreement between the two tests was 67.5% (kappa = 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.40). The IFN-gamma levels increased significantly from 0.05 to 0.19 (p = 0.011), and 3 of IS participants (16.7%) had conversion of their IFN-gamma assay results in the TST-positive group. However, in the TST-negative group, the IFN-gamma levels did not change after the TST. Conclusion: The agreement between the results of the TST and the IFN-gamma assay was low, and IFN-gamma level could be influenced by the TST, in the TST-positive population, when a follow-up IFN-gamma assay is performed 2 to 4 weeks later.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据