4.7 Article

Acute Exacerbations of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis A Case Series

期刊

CHEST
卷 134, 期 4, 页码 844-850

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0428

关键词

acute exacerbatin; diffuse alveolar damage; diffuse alveolar hemorrhage; fibrosis; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: it is now recognized that a significant portion of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can have sudden and rapid deteriorations in disease course that cannot be explained by infection, heart failure, or thromboembolic disease. These events are often fatal and have been termed acute exacerbations (AEs) of underlying disease. While best described in patients with IPF, they have also been reported in patients with other Forms of interstitial lung disease. We sought to determine if this same phenomenon occurs in patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our clinical experience at National Jewish Medical and Research Center For patients with surgical lung biopsy-proven fibrotic HP who had an acute decline in respiratory status and met criteria similar to those proposed for the diagnosis of an AE of IPF. Results: Over a 2-year period, we identified four patients with in AE of fibrotic HP. All patients had a clinical course similar to that most frequently described in AEs of IPF: respiratory failure requiring assisted ventilation, lack of clinical response to high-dose corticosteroid therapy, and a poor prognosis (all cases resulted in death or emergent lung transplantation). Lung biopsy at the time of the. AE, explant, or autopsy revealed organizing diffuse alveolar damage superimposed on fibrotic lung disease. Conclusions: Fibrotic HP, like other forms of fibrotic lung disease, can be associated with AEs of disease. Further investigation into similarities and pathways common in AEs of various fibrotic lung diseases may yield additional insight into this recently recognized syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据