4.8 Article

Multilayered, Bipolar, All-Solid-State Battery Enabled by a Perovskite-Based Biphasic Solid Electrolyte

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 11, 期 18, 页码 3184-3190

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201801399

关键词

electrochemistry; perovskite phases; polymers; organic-inorganic hybrid composites; solid-state structures

资金

  1. R&D Program of National Research Council of Science Technology [CAP-14-2-KITECH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of solid electrolytes provides a technical solution to address the safety issues of lithium-ion batteries and enables a bipolar design of high-voltage and high-energy battery modules. The bipolar design avoids unnecessary components and parts for packaging and electrical connection; therefore, it facilitates an increase in the volumetric energy density of the battery, while enabling easy build-up of total output voltage. Herein, the design and construction of a multilayered, bipolar-type, all-solid-state battery (ASSB) from a biphasic solid electrolyte (BSE) based on inorganic Li0.29La0.57TiO3 perovskite and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) are reported. A flexible and freestanding BSE membrane exhibits high Li+ conductivity of about 1.2x10(-4)Scm(-1), and shows enhanced electrochemical/thermal stability, in comparison to a PEO-only solid electrolyte. A single-layered ASSB assembled with a BSE shows promising electrochemical performance, as evidenced by a high reversible capacity of about 123mAhg(-1) and excellent cycling stability over 100cycles. Furthermore, a proof-of-concept bipolar ASSB comprising three unit cells connected in series is constructed by using the BSE membrane and Al/Cu-cladded bipolar plates. The bipolar ASSB shows high thermal stability and operates reversibly without any internal short circuit or current leakage during charge-discharge cycles; this demonstrates that BSEs provide a promising approach to the design and fabrication of bipolar ASSBs with improved safety and high energy density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据