4.8 Article

Efficient Acid-Base Bifunctional Catalysts for the Fixation of CO2 with Epoxides under Metal- and Solvent-Free Conditions

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 502-507

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201000305

关键词

acidity; catalysis; carbon dioxide fixation; cycloaddition; epoxidation

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB219901]
  2. National Key Technology RD Program [2008BAF33B04]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGCX2-YW-321]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [21006117]
  5. National Science Fund of China for Distinguished Young Scholars [20625618]
  6. Science and Technology Project of Beijing [Y090081135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of acid-base bifunctional catalysts (ABBCs) that contain one or two Bronsted acidic sites in the cationic part and a Lewis-basic site in the anionic part are used as efficient catalysts for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates by cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides, without the use of additional co-catalyst or co-solvent. The effects of the catalyst structures and various reaction parameters on the catalytic performance are investigated in detail. Almost complete conversion can be achieved in 1 h for propylene oxide using [{(CH2)(3)COOH}(2)im]Br under mild reaction conditions (398 K and 2 MPa). Furthermore, the catalyst can be recycled over five times without substantial loss of catalytic activity. This protocol is found to be applicable to a variety of terminal epoxides, producing the corresponding cyclic carbonates in good yields and high selectivities. A synergistic effect of the acidic and the basic sites as well as suitable hydrogen-bonding strength of ABBCs are considered crucial for the reaction to proceed smoothly. The activities of the ABBCs increase remarkably with increasing carboxylic-acid chain length of the cation. This metal-and solvent-free process thus represents an environmentally friendly process for BTC-catalyzed conversion of CO2 into value-added chemicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据