4.5 Article

Intermolecular Interactions in Li+-glyme and Li+-glyme-TFSA- Complexes: Relationship with Physicochemical Properties of [Li(glyme)][TFSA] Ionic Liquids

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 1993-2001

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201200843

关键词

geometry optimization; glyme complexes; intermolecular interactions; ionic liquids; stabilization energy

资金

  1. ALCA program of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23350033, 24655142, 24750192, 23245046] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stabilization energies (Eform) calculated for the formation of the Li+ complexes with mono-, di- tri- and tetra-glyme (G1, G2, G3 and G4) at the MP2/6-311G** level were -61.0, -79.5, -95.6 and -107.7 kcalmol-1, respectively. The electrostatic and induction interactions are the major sources of the attraction in the complexes. Although the Eform increases by the increase of the number of the OLi contact, the Eform per oxygen atom decreases. The negative charge on the oxygen atom that has contact with the Li+ weakens the attractive electrostatic and induction interactions of other oxygen atoms with the Li+. The binding energies calculated for the [Li(glyme)]+ complexes with TFSA- anion (glyme=G1, G2, G3, and G4) were -106.5, -93.7, -82.8, and -70.0 kcalmol-1, respectively. The binding energies for the complexes are significantly smaller than that for the Li+ with the TFSA- anion. The binding energy decreases by the increase of the glyme chain length. The weak attraction between the [Li(glyme)]+ complex (glyme=G3 and G4) and TFSA- anion is one of the causes of the fast diffusion of the [Li(glyme)]+ complex in the mixture of the glyme and the Li salt in spite of the large size of the [Li(glyme)]+ complex. The HOMO energy level of glyme in the [Li(glyme)]+ complex is significantly lower than that of isolated glyme, which shows that the interaction of the Li+ with the oxygen atoms of glyme increases the oxidative stability of the glyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据