4.5 Review

Comparison of Low-Frequency Spectra between Aromatic and Nonaromatic Cation Based Ionic Liquids Using Femtosecond Raman-Induced Kerr Effect Spectroscopy

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 1638-1648

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100731

关键词

aromaticity; cations; ionic liquids; low-frequency spectra; vibrational spectroscopy

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [19559001, 21685001]
  2. Izumi Science and Technology Foundation
  3. Futaba Electronics Memorial Foundation
  4. Iwatani Naoji Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19559001, 21685001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this minireview, the features of low-frequency spectra within the frequency range 0200 cm-1 for aromatic and nonaromatic cation based ionic liquids obtained by femtosecond Raman-induced Kerr effect spectroscopy are reviewed. For aromatic cation based ionic liquids, the aromatic group of the cations is largely responsible for the spectral line shape due to their larger polarizability anisotropy volume and more polarizable nature than nonaromatic cations. The low-frequency Kerr spectra are also compared with the bulk properties of the ionic liquids. The differences in the relationship of the first moment of the low-frequency spectrum band and the bulk properties between the aromatic and nonaromatic cation based ionic liquids with respect to the natures of constituent ions and microscopic aspects are discussed. For aromatic cation based ionic liquids, the ionic region is more pronounced than the nonpolar region in their low-frequency Kerr spectra. In contrast, the ionic and nonpolar regions of nonaromatic cation based ionic liquids are likely to be captured due to the weaker signal of the cationic region. Also, the low-frequency Kerr spectra of the nonaromatic analogues are influenced by their weaker segregation as compared to aromatic cation based ionic liquids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据