4.2 Article

Antitumor Activity of Cucumarioside A2-2

期刊

CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 181-191

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000354156

关键词

Sea cucumbers; Triterpene glycosides; Cucumarioside A(2)-2; Cytotoxicity; Antitumor activity; Apoptosis

资金

  1. RFBR [11-04-01084-a]
  2. FEBRAS [09-II-YO-05-002]
  3. FEBRAS-NNC Taiwan [100WFA06002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The cytotoxic activity of sea cucumber glycosides against different types of cells and cell lines, including human tumor cell lines, has been studied for many years. However, the molecular mechanism(s) of the antitumor action of triterpene glycosides on cancer cells remain unclear. This article reports a continuation of investigations of triterpene glycoside cucumarioside A(2)-2 isolated from the Far-Eastern sea cucumber Cucumaria japonica. It describes a study of glycoside anticancer activity in vivo and glycoside interaction with mouse Ehrlich carcinoma cells in vitro. Methods: The cytotoxicity of cucumarioside A(2)-2 and its effect on apoptosis, the cell cycle, DNA biosynthesis and p53 activity, and glycoside anticancer action against Ehrlich carcinoma cells were studied. Results: Cucumarioside A(2)-2 influences tumor cell viability at micromolar concentrations. The EC50 for glycoside estimated by nonspecific esterase assay and MTT assay was 2.1 and 2.7 mu m, respectively. Cucumarioside A(2)-2 at a subcytotoxic range of concentrations exhibits a cytostatic effect by blocking cell proliferation and DNA biosynthesis in the S phase. It may induce apoptosis in tumor cells in a caspase-dependent way, bypassing the activation of the p53-dependent segment. Conclusion: The anticancer and proapoptotic properties of cucumarioside A(2)-2 may be due to direct interaction of the glycoside with tumor cells. The in vivo anticancer effect of cucumarioside A2-2 may be associated with the ability of the drug to arrest the cell cycle in the synthetic phase and induce programmed tumor cell death. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据